Drawing for MICROBUBBLE

USPTO serial 85771377

MICROBUBBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MICROBUBBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Strauss

STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LLP6100 CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1200HOWARD HUGHES CENTERLOS ANGELES, CA 90045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011SPAS IN THE NATURE OF HEATED POOLS, HEATED POOLS, HOT TUBS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS AND STRUCTURAL ACCESSORIES THEREFORACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 19, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 19, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 7, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 25, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 25, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 29, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 27, 2012AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Nov 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 9, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 8, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance