Drawing for THE LIQUID CHEF

USPTO serial 85771641

THE LIQUID CHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LIQUID CHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Y. Jae Kim

Y. Jae Kim KIM WINSTON LLP1307 White Horse Road, Suite 601Voorhees, NJ 08043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational, training and entertainment services in the nature of television programs in the fields of bartending, cocktail design, the history of alcoholic beverages, and the culinary and beverage artsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 23, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 24, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 18, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 20, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 29, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 17, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 21, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 21, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 21, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 5, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 5, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 29, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 9, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 8, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance