USPTO serial 85776381
FARMER ARMOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FARMER ARMOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raj Abhyanker
RAJ ABHYANKER RAJ ABHYANKER PC1580 W EL CAMINO REALSTE 8MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040-2462Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and skin care products, namely, lip balms and glosses, non-medicated skin care creams and lotions, bath oils for cosmetic purposes, facial moisturizers, hand soaps, liquid soaps, shaving balms, shaving lotions, colognes, dentifrices, hair styling preparations, hair shampoos and conditioners and deodorants, hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes, sun care preparations, sun screen, non-medicated preparations to protect the skin from the effects of wind, and tanning oils | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |