Drawing for FIRETEC

USPTO serial 85793455

FIRETEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRETEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric J. Brickenstein

ENGRED K. CHAI BROWNSTEIN RASK1200 SW MAIN STPORTLAND, OR 97205-2040UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic building products for fire doors, jambs and other fire rated openings in buildings and ships, namely, fire rated door jamb components, fire rated door stile components, fire rated door core components, and fire rated door rail componentsACTIVE
020Non-metallic building products for fire doors, jambs and other fire rated openings in building and ships, namely non-metal door fittings, fire rated lock block components, fire rated door closure componentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 29, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 17, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 27, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 17, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 21, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 20, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 7, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 7, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 7, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 7, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 7, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 17, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 16, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 21, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 20, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 13, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 12, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 6, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance