USPTO serial 85852017
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; 3-in-1 organic soap bars for use as soap, shampoo and conditioner; Baby hair conditioner; Baby shampoo; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Hair balsam; Hair care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair conditioners for babies; Hair curling preparations; Hair dressings for men; Hair dressings for women; Hair gel; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair gels; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair rinses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair spray; Hair sprays; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair styling fixative in the nature of hair wax; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair waving preparations; Moisturizing creams; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for hair conditioning; Pomades for Hair; Preparations for setting hair; Shampoo-conditioners; Shampoos | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |