USPTO serial 85852805
SAFEBAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFEBAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eden Prairie, MN
Eden Prairie, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kari B. Frank
KARI B. FRANK DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Dough enhancers made from flaxseed for use in manufacturing food to improve texture and increase moisture absorption | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flaxseed for human consumption; milled flaxseed for human consumption; processed flaxseed for human consumption; cocoa-based beverages; grain-based beverages; grain-based food beverages; bread doughs; brownie dough; cake doughs; cookie dough; dough; empanada dough; filo dough; frozen brownie dough; frozen cookie dough; frozen dough for use as pizza, bread or other bread-type products; pastry dough; phyllo dough; pizza dough; wafer doughs; mixes for making baking batters; mixes for making batters for fried foods; mixes for making batter for hushpuppies; pre-mixed pancake batter; tempura batter mix; bases for bakery goods; mixes for bakery goods; bread mixes; brownie mixes; cake mixes; cookie mixes; crepe mixes; instant doughnut mixes; mixes for making breading; mixes for making matzo balls; muffin mixes; pancake mixes; pastry mixes; pizza crust mixes; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; frozen, prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; bakery desserts; bakery goods; bakery products; biscuits; bread; bread rolls; bread sticks; brownies; buns; cakes; cereal bars; cereal-based snack foods; cookies; cup cakes; donuts; doughnuts; empanadas; flapjacks; flat bread; fresh pasta; fresh pizza; grain-based beverages; grain-based chips; grain-based snack foods; granola-based snack bars; macaroni; uncooked macaroni; muffins; noodles; oatmeal; packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; pasta; pastry; pie crusts; pizza; pizza crust; pizza dough; ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; ready-to-eat cereals; snack cakes; soft pretzels; spaghetti; waffles; breakfast cereals; cereal-based snack food; processed cereals; processed grains; processed oats; processed wheat; rolled oats; wafers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | PBMR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |