USPTO serial 85853292
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software in the field of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) which integrates internal and external management information across an entire organization's fundamental business activities such as human resource management, salary calculation, finance and accounting, fixed assets management, manufacturing management, sales and service management and customer relationship management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services, namely, designing, developing, customizing, installing, integrating, networking, repairing and maintaining computer software used for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP); hosting the software applications of others used for enterprise resource planning (ERP) via a virtual private server; computer server management services, namely, software configuration management services for computer servers; Application Service Provider (ASP) services in the field of Enterprise Resource Planning, namely, hosting computer software applications of others in the field of enterprise resource planning; application service provider (ASP) services featuring software in the field of enterprise resource planning, namely, software for use in human resource management, salary calculation, finance and accounting management, fixed assets management, manufacturing management, sales management, product service management, customer relationship management, corporate planning management, logistics and supply chain management, product development cycle management, facilities security management, information technology department management, facilities systems management, purchasing management and other basic corporate resource management; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in human resource management, salary calculation, finance and accounting management, fixed assets management, manufacturing management, sales management, product service management, customer relationship management, corporate planning management, logistics and supply chain management, product development cycle management, facilities security management, information technology department management, facilities systems management, purchasing management and other basic corporate resource management, all in the field of enterprise resource planning; rental of computer systems; Cloud computing services, namely, providing online nondownloadable cloud-based software for use in human resource management, salary calculation, finance and accounting management, fixed assets management, manufacturing management, sales management, product service management, customer relationship management, corporate planning management, logistics and supply chain management, product development cycle management, facilities security management, information technology department management, facilities systems management, purchasing management and other basic corporate resource management, all in the field of enterprise resource planning; cloud computing services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; consulting services related to the foregoing services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 15, 2014 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |