CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ECOFOREST

USPTO serial 85859128

ECOFOREST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOFOREST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith Swedo

Keith J. Swedo Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP10 W. Market St.Suite 2700Indianapolis, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes, namely, heat convectors, heat radiators, heat accumulators, convector stoves, namely, pellet stoves, air filters for air conditioning systems, heat exchangers, thermostatic valves, heat pumps, geothermal heat pumps, electric stoves, gas stoves, water stoves in the nature of wood pellet burning firebox surrounded by hot water which utilizes water for heating, air stoves, air stoves in the nature of a stove that radiates the heat from the fire, pressurizes it and distributed by a large blower, wood burning stoves, gas condensers other than parts of machines, refrigerating appliances and installations, air circulation apparatus, namely, electric fansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2013MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance