USPTO serial 85862118
PURE OXYGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE OXYGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas B. Haverstock
THOMAS B. HAVERSTOCK HAVERSTOCK & OWENS LLP162 N WOLFE RDSUNNYVALE, CA 94086UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services; professional business consultation relating to the operation of businesses; business services, namely, matching buyers with potential suppliers to facilitate contractual purchases of a wide variety of products and services; business services, namely, negotiation and conclusion of commercial transactions between buyers and suppliers for the purchase of goods and services; business services, namely, negotiation and procurement of purchase contracts for third parties in a wide variety of markets and fields; business data pricing and supplier analysis; tracking and monitoring suppliers of goods and services for business purposes; purchasing agent services, namely, strategic goods or services business sourcing for others; procurement expenditure category analysis in the nature of business information analysis; compiling and analyzing business analytics, namely, spend analytics and segmentation; advisory, consulting and information services relating to business-to-business practices, analysis and sourcing; administrative processing of purchase orders; purchasing and procurement services, namely, procuring of contracts for others, including between small and medium enterprises, for the purchase of goods and services; marketing services, namely, recruiting buyers, suppliers, or both to communicate with each other and manage commercial transactions between themselves; business networking services, namely, recruiting buyers and suppliers into a business network; electronic processing of orders for others; negotiation and settlement of commercial transactions for third parties; electronic processing of supplier rebates | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; electronic and electronic commerce bill payment services; credit card purchase transaction authorization services; credit card payment processing; business and business-to-business finance procurement services; merchant services, namely, payment transaction processing services; electronic payment services for others involving electronic matching of invoices to authorizations for approval; electronic processing of augmented outsourced payments, cloud-based payments, and securitized rebate cash flows; and offering securitized cash rebates to investors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oxygen Finance Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Oxygen Finance Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named PURE OXYGEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |