USPTO serial 85862469
EVERGLADES HOLIDAY PARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERGLADES HOLIDAY PARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southwest Ranches, FL
Southwest Ranches, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald S. Showalter
DONALD S. SHOWALTER GRAYROBINSON, P.A.PO BOX 2328FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33303-2328UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of zip line rides for recreational purposes; entertainment services in the nature of providing an artificial rock climbing wall | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |