Drawing for WIND RUNNER

USPTO serial 85862680

WIND RUNNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIND RUNNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce W. McKee

BRUCE W MCKEE MCKEE VOORHEES & SEASE PLC801 GRAND AVESTE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing of game centers, namely, amusement arcadesACTIVE
042Hosting computer sites, namely, web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; creating and maintaining web sites for others; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; installation of computer software; computer system design; data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; duplication of computer programs; computer rental; recovery of computer data; computer game software design; updating of computer game software; maintenance of computer game software; computer systems analysis; computer programming; technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware; product research and development in the field of computer game software; rental of network servers; providing internet search enginesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 4, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 19, 2015MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED
Jun 15, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 15, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 15, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 15, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 15, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 15, 2015RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED
Jun 15, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 15, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 30, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 12, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Nov 12, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Nov 12, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Sep 15, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 15, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 15, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 22, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 22, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 5, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2013EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Jun 5, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jun 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Mar 6, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 4, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance