USPTO serial 85862772
NATURE MADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURE MADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mission Hills, CA
West Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER B BROMAGHIM
PETER B BROMAGHIM WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soy-based food bars; soy-based snack foods; fruit-based meal replacement bars; vegetable-based food bars; nut and seed based snack bars; soy-based beverages used as milk substitutes; yogurts; yogurt-based beverages; soups; preparations for making soups; coffee creamers; creamers for beverages; dried fruits, candied fruit; candied fruit snacks; dried fruit-based snacks; fruit jellies and purees; dried vegetables; dried vegetable in powder form; vegetable-based snack foods; fruit-based snack foods; nutritionally fortified food products in the nature of edible oils, diary-based beverages, and dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |