USPTO serial 85863710
ALYX-IA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALYX-IA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY J BENJAMIN
AMY J BENJAMIN BENJAMIN LAW PC111 E 14TH ST STE 469NEW YORK, NY 10003-4103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | NATURAL SWEETENERS; SUGAR SUBSTITUTES; A BLEND OF NATURAL SWEETENERS; A BLEND OF SUGAR SUBSTITUTES; CHEWING GUM; SUGAR-FREE CHEWING GUM; SUGAR-FREE CANDIES; SUGAR-FREE LOLLIPOPS; SUGAR-FREE NON-MEDICATED LOZENGES; SUGAR-FREE CHOCOLATE; CONDIMENTS SWEETENED WITH NATURAL SWEETENERS, NAMELY, KETCHUP, BARBECUE SAUCE, SAUCES FOR POULTRY AND SAUCES FOR MEAT, TERIYAKI SAUCE; BEVERAGES, NAMELY, SOFT DRINKS, COFFEE-FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT-BASED SOFT DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA, SOFT DRINKS MADE WITH TEA, BEVERAGES MADE OF TEA, BEVERAGES MADE OF COFFEE, BEVERAGES WITH A CHOCOLATE BASE, CHOCOLATE-BASED BEVERAGES WITH MILK, GRAIN-BASED BEVERAGES, GRASS-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES, HERBAL FOOD BEVERAGES, PREPARED COCOA AND COCOA-BASED BEVERAGES SWEETENED WITH A BLEND OF NATURAL SWEETENERS; BEVERAGES SWEETENED WITH A BLEND OF NATURAL SWEETENERS; FOOD PRODUCTS SWEETENED WITH A BLEND OF NATURAL SWEETENERS; SYRUP IN THE NAUTRE OF TABLE SYRUP FOR FOOD; HONEY | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | SMOOTHIES AND ENERGY DRINKS SWEETENED WITH A BLEND OF NATURAL SWEETENERS; BEVERAGES, NAMELY, ALOE JUICE BEVERAGES, APPLE JUICE BEVERAGES, COCONUT-BASED BEVERAGES NOT BEING MILK SUBSTITUTES, FROZEN CARBONATED BEVERAGES, FROZEN FRUIT BEVERAGES, FROZEN FRUIT-BASED BEVERAGES, FRUIT-BASED BEVERAGES, FRUIT-FLAVORED BEVERAGES, GRAPE JUICE BEVERAGES, ORANGE JUICE BEVERAGES, PINEAPPLE JUICE BEVERAGES, SOY-BASED BEVERAGES NOT BEING MILK SUBSTITUTES, TOMATO JUICE, VEGETABLE JUICE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |