USPTO serial 85863792
DIDUCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIDUCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary J. Koo
GARY J. KOO SHINJYU GLOBAL IPMINAMIMORI-MACHI, KITA-KUS. FOREST BLDG. 11TH FL. 1-4-19OSAKA, 530-0054Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for email management, for searching and retrieving email, for configuring electrical distribution products, for quoting electrical distribution products, for ordering electrical distribution products, and for searching and retrieving information; Blank CD/DVD ROMS for sound or video recording, for use in CD/DVD ROM drives, for use in CD/DVD-ROM writers; CD-ROMs pre-recoded with software therein for searching and retrieving information; DVD-ROMs pre-recoded with software therein for searching and retrieving information; Blank USB flash drives, blank USB memory devices; USB memory devices pre-recorded with software for searching and retrieving information; Blank optical discs, blank recordable optical disc; Optical Discs pre-recorded with software for searching and retrieving information; Recording Discs pre-recorded with software for searching and retrieving information; Couplers, data processors; Data Processing equipment pre-recorded with software for searching and retrieving information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |