USPTO serial 85863823
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MADURAI, Tamil Nadu, IN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Dorisio
ANDREW D. DORISIO KING & SCHICKLI, PLLC800 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 200LEXINGTON, KY 40503UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, Laptop Computers, Tablet PC or Tablet Personal Computer PC, Telephones including Telephones for domestic use, Land-line Telephone, Cordless Telephones, Car Telephones, Electronic Telephones, VOIP-enabled Phone, Video Telephones, Mobile Telephones, Cellular Phones, Mobile Phones, Cell Phones, Tablet Smartphones, Phones with Touch Screens, Smartphones, Phones with Keyboards for Text Messaging, Multimedia Phones, Phones with multiple Sockets, mobile phones with multiple sockets, mobile phones with two or more Sockets, Mobile Phone with Small Sized Sockets, Sockets for Mobile phones, Small sized sockets for mobile phones, Phone with multiple sockets, Phones with two or more sockets, Phones with Small Sized Sockets, Satellite Mobile Telephones, Satellite Cellular Telephones, Satellite Mobile Phones, network communication equipment, namely, modem, router, WiFi, optical communication equipment, namely, fiber optic products | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |