Drawing for WEED ARE THE WORLD

USPTO serial 85864255

WEED ARE THE WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEED ARE THE WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I. Morley Drucker

I. MORLEY DRUCKER FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DR FL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-1598UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion picture films featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and animation; motion picture films for broadcast on television featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and animation; prerecorded audio tapes, audio-video tapes, audio video cassettes, audio video discs, and digital versatile disc films featuring music, comedy, drama, action, adventure, and animation; computer programs, namely, software for broadcasting digitized video and audio media over a global computer information network; computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, computer game discs, DVDs recorded with computer games, USB flash drives recorded with computer games, computer game cartridges; discs recorded with computer games sold as a unit with computer game programs for playing a parlor-type computer game; interactive video game programs and computer game programs; video game cartridges and cassettes, video game discs; video and computer game software; downloadable computer game software from a global computer network; interactive video game program sold as a unit with a video game controllerACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 7, 2014PBTQWITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST
May 1, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 1, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 1, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 30, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 30, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 18, 2014PBTQWITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST
Apr 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 19, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 18, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 18, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 18, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 18, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 18, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 18, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 18, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 5, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance