USPTO serial 85865170
MAN VS. BEAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAN VS. BEAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirsten Severson
KIRSTEN SEVERSON KLS TRADEMARK SERVICESPO BOX 19126, 4TH AVENUE POSTVANCOUVER, BC, V6K4R8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing online non-downloadable books, magazines, and newsletters in the fields of hunting, fishing, outdoor wilderness, sport, travel and adventure; entertainment services, namely, live performances in the fields of hunting, fishing, outdoor wilderness, sport, travel and adventure; entertainment services, namely, a television series featuring hunting, fishing, outdoor wilderness, sport, travel and adventure; providing a website featuring information in the fields of hunting, fishing, outdoor wilderness, sport, travel and adventure; providing online non-downloadable audio and video recordings and podcasts in the fields of hunting, fishing, outdoor wilderness, sport, travel and adventure; providing online blogs in the fields of hunting, fishing, outdoor wilderness, sport, travel and adventure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |