USPTO serial 85865339
MYRTLE BEACH HOTELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4445353Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 3, 2013
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYRTLE BEACH HOTELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Myrtle Beach, SC
Myrtle Beach, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Weslow
MYRTLE BEACH HOTELS LLC1143 ROBERT M GRISSOM PKWYMYRTLE BEACH, SC 29577UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management of hotels for others; hotel management for others | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 10, 2010 |
| 043 | Hotel services; making hotel reservations for others; providing information and advice on hotels and restaurants to tourists and business travellers | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 10, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2016 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| May 19, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |