USPTO serial 85867584
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NIPPON DENSHIN DENWA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by NIPPON DENSHIN DENWA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
NIPPON DENSHIN DENWA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by NIPPON DENSHIN DENWA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
NIPPON DENSHIN DENWA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by NIPPON DENSHIN DENWA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314-3454UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Upgrading of computer hardware for cloud computing; providing general information technology support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware via internet, telephone, e-mail and in person | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 9, 2013 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; research and development in the field of cloud computing; engineering, testing and technical design services for cloud computing networks; testing, analyzing and evaluating the operational properties of cloud computing networks; design of computer hardware and software for cloud computing; upgrading of computer software for cloud computing; scientific study and research in the field of cloud computing; conducting feasibility studies in the field of cloud computing; computer consultation and information technology computer consultation in the fields of computer application systems development and maintenance, information technology architecture and engineering, computer systems consulting and computer project outsourcing; providing general information technology support services, namely, troubleshooting of software problems via internet, telephone, e-mail and in person; providing general information technology support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; computer services, namely, providing virtual and non-virtual application servers, web servers, file servers, co-location servers, load balancing servers, redundancy servers, media servers and database servers of variable capacity to third party computing and data storage facilities; technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; computer services, namely, providing virtual and non-virtual application, load balancing servers to others; rental of a database server; rental of web servers; technical support services, namely, migration of datacenter, server and database applications; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for management of computers on cloud or network resources; data migration services; data mining; data warehousing; development, updating and maintenance of software and data bases; remote online backup of computer data; computer programming and rental of computer programs; design and development of computer programs; rental of computer software and programs; computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; consulting services in the field of cloud computing; providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network by the internet or by cellular telephones and other communication means; cloud computing featuring software for use in database management; hosting the websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; hosting of intranets on a computer server for others; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; monitoring the computer systems of others for technological purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; computer consultation in the field of computer networks and computer security; computer consulting on creating and maintaining other's web sites, namely, consulting on software, bandwidth, capacity for web sites and security for other's web sites; hosting the software, websites and other computer applications of others on a virtual private server; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; computer co-location services, namely, providing facilities for the location of computer servers with the equipment of others; consultation services in the field of search engine optimization; design, creation, hosting, maintenance of websites for others; hosting of digital content on the internet; computer services, namely, acting as an application services provider for third parties featuring secure remote hosting of operating systems and computer applications; hosting the software and computer applications of others on a virtual private server for secure access by authenticated users; rental of computing and data storage facilities of variable capacity to third parties, namely, rental of web servers and rental of database servers within a cloud infrastructure; providing on-line non-downloadable operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; providing on-line non-downloadable software for operating and maintaining computer networks and servers; computer services and computer software consultation, namely, management of computer software applications assets through applications assessment, applications management and applications rationalization for the purpose of reducing costs; hosting software for use by others in the nature of computer software used for the transmission of information and data within cloud computing networks; hosting computer software used for managing, operating, monitoring and developing cloud computing and remote computing networks; rental of memory areas of computer servers for communications networks; computer infrastructure hosting services, namely, infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services in the nature of providing web-based virtual desktop environments through use of hosted computer hardware and computer software resources | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 9, 2013 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |