USPTO serial 85868553
GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5029442Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2016
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MIQUEL ALIMENTACIO GRUP, S.A.U.
Vilamalla (Gerona), ES
MIQUEL ALIMENTACIO GRUP, S.A.U.
Vilamalla (Gerona), ES
MIQUEL ALIMENTACIO GRUP, S.A.U.
Vilamalla (Gerona), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
LISA W. ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP452 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10018-2706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; rice; tapioca and sago; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals, cereal-based snack foods, processed cereals; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, sweets; edible ices; sugar, honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; condiments, namely, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-alcoholic cocktails, cider, carbonated beverages, fruit beverages and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages; other preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIQUEL ALIMENTACIO GRUP, S.A.U.
- Other trademarks owned by MIQUEL ALIMENTACIO GRUP, S.A.U.
- Other trademarks owned by MIQUEL ALIMENTACIO GRUP, S.A.U.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named GOURMET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |