Drawing for D DECISYON

USPTO serial 85903060

D DECISYON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARESCA, MEREDITH Z
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with D DECISYON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas Y. Yee

Thomas Y. Yee KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Enterprise business software that enables the development of data-driven solutions by providing real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various data sources and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; enterprise business software that enables the development of data-driven solutions that offer and provide analysis, planning, simulation, collaboration and execution capabilities in a unified environment, monitor the social activities on social media sites of people and organizations, manage social networking campaigns, integrate social data with customer relationship management systems, control and monitor manufacturing processes, and create scorecards and related information for suppliers in supply chainsACTIVEDec 10, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jul 3, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 2, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 5, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 1, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 1, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 1, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 12, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 12, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 19, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance