USPTO serial 85925852
TEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Cabott, Esq.
CHRISTOPHER J CABOTT LAW OFFICE OF LLOYD Z REMICK1650 MARKET ST FL 56PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7337UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting youth football programs; Health club services, namely, providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exercise; Providing a website featuring information relating to the sport of football; Providing facilities for physical fitness and football performance training; Providing information relating to sports and sporting events; Providing sports facilities for football performance training; Sport camps; Sports instruction services | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2015 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |