USPTO serial 85953038
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald Wright
Ronald Wright MCATHERN PLLC2000 West Loop South, Suite 1850HOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cleansing creams; Concealers; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic pads; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Cosmetic white face powder; Cosmetics; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics and make-up; Cosmetics, namely, compacts; Cosmetics, namely, lip primer; Cotton for cosmetic purposes; Eyebrow cosmetics; Face creams for cosmetic use; Lip stains; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Make-up kits comprised of blush, eyeshadow, highlighters and contours | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2015 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2015 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2015 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 8, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |