Drawing for PEAK PERFORMANCE ECOSYSTEM ADVANCED ANALYTICS OPTIMIZATION CONSTANT COMMISSIONING M V BUILDING REQUIREMENTS DESIGN CONTROLS BMS MECHANICAL MANAGEMENT MAINTENANCE

USPTO serial 85961390

PEAK PERFORMANCE ECOSYSTEM ADVANCED ANALYTICS OPTIMIZATION CONSTANT COMMISSIONING M V BUILDING REQUIREMENTS DESIGN CONTROLS BMS MECHANICAL MANAGEMENT MAINTENANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PEAK PERFORMANCE ECOSYSTEM ADVANCED ANALYTICS OPTIMIZATION CONSTANT COMMISSIONING M V BUILDING REQUIREMENTS DESIGN CONTROLS BMS MECHANICAL MANAGEMENT MAINTENANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH A. URADNIK

JOSEPH A. URADNIK URADNIK LAW FIRM PCPO BOX 47624MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447-0624UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing on-line, non-downloadable software for use in monitoring, operation, control, management, data acquisition, reporting, and automation services for facilities heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, energy use, and power management; providing on-line, non-downloadable software for use in storing, managing, tracking and analyzing data in the field of facilities heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, energy use, and power management; providing on-line, non-downloadable software for use in creating statistical and management reports in the field of facilities heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, energy use, and power management; and providing online hosted computer services, namely, designing, developing, customizing, implementing, and maintaining computer software applications for others in the field of facilities heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, energy use, and power managementACTIVEJul 15, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 7, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2014CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 13, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 31, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 2, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jan 2, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 2, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 2, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 13, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 10, 2013AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Aug 10, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2013DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Aug 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 7, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 26, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Jun 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 20, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance