USPTO serial 85973526
SUPERIOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4668860Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2015
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPERIOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward B Weller
Edward B Weller LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD B WELLER101 Marketside Ave Ste. 404-401Ponte Vedra, FL 32081UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Controller systems comprising a micro processor for industrial equipment; controller systems comprising a micro processor used for semiconductor manufacturing systems; electrical controllers; electronic controllers used for semiconductor manufacturing systems; electronic controllers for industrial equipment in the field of semiconductor manufacturing; configurable electronic controllers for industrial equipment in the field of semiconductor manufacturing; electronic input/output controllers for industrial equipment in the field of semiconductor manufacturing; configurable electronic input/output controllers for industrial equipment in the field of semiconductor manufacturing; electronic control systems for machines in industrial equipment; electronic input/output control systems for machines in industrial equipment; embedded systems, namely, computer hardware and software for machine control, sold as a component part of controller systems used for semiconductor manufacturing; interface modules for embedded machine control applications in industrial equipment; remote interface modules for embedded machine control applications in industrial equipment; control modules for embedded machine control applications in industrial equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 12, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 28, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |