USPTO serial 85975043
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand
Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP65 East 55th StreetNew York, NY 10022-3402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Luggage, namely, small leather bags, wallets, satchels, handbags | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Fitted fabric slipcovers for furniture; tabletop decorations in the nature of figurines made of bone, ivory, plaster, plastic, wax or wood | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Fabrics for household use, namely, bath linens, namely, bath towels, beach towels, bed linen, namely, bed sheets, pillow-cases and bed-spreads, table-top linens, namely, table cloths of textile, fabric table runners, cloth coasters, textile napkins and placemats of textile material, fabric throws, window treatments, namely, curtains, draperies, sheers, swags and valances | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, shirts, dresses, blouses, skirts, outerwear in the nature of coats, jackets and sweaters, athletic wear in the nature of sweatpants, sweatshirts, shirts, tee-shirts, tank tops, shorts and leggings, swimwear, robes, children's wear in the nature of pants, shirts, dresses, blouses, skirts, shorts, jackets, coats and sweaters, footwear, namely, sneakers and headgear, namely, caps and hats | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |