USPTO serial 85976337
SHA SHA HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHA SHA HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Grenier,
MICHELLE L. GRENIER, GRENIER LAW OFFICES, PC13 Fox Run RoadFalmouth, ME 04105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer containing alcohol; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated drinks; non-alcoholic, non-carbonated drinks, namely, mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, fruit juices, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; fruit flavored beverages, fruit drinks and fruit juices; non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor, vegetable juices, vegetable drinks, vegetable juices; colas; sodas in the nature of soda water, and flavored soda water; soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes; sports drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2012 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |