USPTO serial 85976650
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua J. Burke
JOSHUA J. BURKE GENERAL MILLS, INC.1 GENERAL MILLS BLVDMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426-1348UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | SOUP; BROTH; PACKAGED MAIN MEAL MIXES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF POTATOES; PACKAGED ENTREES AND SIDE DISHES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF POTATOES; FROZEN VEGETABLES WITH AND WITHOUT SAUCE; FROZEN VEGETABLES; FRUIT-BASED SNACK FOODS; POTATO-BASED SNACK FOODS; NUT-BASED SNACK BARS; ALL OF THE FOREGOING BEING GLUTEN-FREE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 2011 |
| 030 | BAKERY GOODS; CEREAL BASED SNACK FOOD; PACKAGED MAIN MEAL MIXES AND SIDE DISHES HAVING EITHER A CEREAL BASE, RICE BASE, OR PASTA BASE; PASTA; PREPARED, REFRIGERATED AND FROZEN MEALS AND SIDE DISHES HAVING EITHER A CEREAL BASE, RICE BASE, OR PASTA BASE; BREAKFAST PASTRIES; BAKING MIXES; FROSTING AND FROSTING MIXES; PIE CRUSTS; PANCAKE AND WAFFLE MIXES; PROCESSED CEREAL-BASED FOOD TO BE USED AS A BREAKFAST FOOD, SNACK FOOD OR INGREDIENT FOR MAKING OTHER FOODS; GRANOLA; REFRIGERATED AND FROZEN DOUGH FOR COOKIES, BREAD, PIZZA, AND OTHER FOOD PRODUCTS; BREAD CRUMBS; CROUTONS; TEA; CRACKERS; PRETZELS; CANDY; CHOCOLATE; PIZZA; PIZZA CRUSTS; FLOUR; PROCESSED GRAINS; GRAVIES AND GRAVY MIXES; SAUCES AND SAUCE MIXES; ALL OF THE FOREGOING BEING GLUTEN-FREE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |