Drawing for ALLTHATGLITTERS21

USPTO serial 85981391

ALLTHATGLITTERS21

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALLTHATGLITTERS21?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy V. Stephens

NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER PLLC1111 Third AvenueSUITE 3000SEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics; Make-up; Make-up for the face and bodyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 21, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 21, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 21, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 10, 2016EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT
Sep 6, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 27, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 27, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 17, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jun 17, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jun 17, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 11, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Mar 10, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 28, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2014FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2014INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST
Feb 27, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 20, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Nov 21, 2012GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Nov 21, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Nov 2, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 2, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 2, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 2, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 30, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 30, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 30, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 30, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 30, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 28, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 28, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2011GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2011GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2011NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED
Sep 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 31, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug 30, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 10, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 11, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance