USPTO serial 85981391
ALLTHATGLITTERS21
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLTHATGLITTERS21?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy V. Stephens
NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER PLLC1111 Third AvenueSUITE 3000SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics; Make-up; Make-up for the face and body | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |