Drawing for INDULGENCE

USPTO serial 86002701

INDULGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDULGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould, P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer-gaming software; gaming software that generates and displays wager outcomes of gaming machines; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for playing games; downloadable electronic games playable via a global computer network, handheld electronic devices, portable video players, portable music players, smart phones, laptop computers, handheld computers, tablet computers, cellular phones, pagers, personal digital assistants, digital television set-top boxes, interactive digital television controllers and programmable digital television recorders; Downloadable software and computer programs for playing casino games, slot games, lottery games, online wagering games and online electronic games; Downloadable electronic game programs and softwareACTIVE
028Gaming machines, namely, devices that accept a wagerACTIVE
041Gaming services, namely, on-line gambling; gaming services, namely, operation of an on-line casino providing video slot games playable via a global computer network; providing on-line non-downloadable gaming software for playing games via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, conducting a game of chance simultaneously at multiple, independent gaming establishments; Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable electronic gamesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 4, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 4, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 15, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 15, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 20, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Oct 10, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 7, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 6, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Oct 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 6, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 6, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 25, 2014GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED
Apr 25, 2014GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED
Apr 25, 2014NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED
Apr 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 10, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 27, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 15, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 8, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance