USPTO serial 86018083
D LUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D LUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne H. Peck
ANNE H PECK COOLEY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NWSUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Athletic shirts; Baseball caps and hats; Clothing for babies, toddlers and children, treated with fire and heat retardants, namely, pajamas, jackets, shirts, pants, jumpers; Hats; Hats for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Hooded sweat shirts; Long-sleeved shirts; Open-necked shirts; Shirt fronts; Shirts; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Tee shirts | ACTIVE | Jun 28, 2001 |
| 029 | Beverages consisting principally of milk; Beverages having a milk base; Beverages made with yoghurt; Dairy-based beverages; Dairy-based chocolate food beverages; Dairy-based food beverages; Dairy-based food beverages also containing cocoa; Fruit-based food beverage; Milk based beverages containing fruit juice; Milk beverages containing fruits; Milk beverages with high milk content; Milk-based beverage containing coffee; Milk-based beverages containing milk concentrates, vegetable oil and added nutrients; Milk-based beverages with chocolate; Milk-based beverages with high milk content; Peanut-based food beverages; Soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; Yogurt-based beverages | ACTIVE | Jun 28, 2001 |
| 030 | Beverages made of coffee; Beverages made of tea; Beverages with a chocolate base; Beverages with a coffee base; Beverages with a tea base; Chocolate-based beverages; Chocolate-based beverages with milk; Coffee based beverages; Coffee beverages with milk; Coffee-based beverage containing milk; Coffee-based beverages; Coffee-based iced beverages; Tea-based beverages; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; Tea-based iced beverages | ACTIVE | Jun 28, 2001 |
| 032 | Apple juice beverages; Beauty beverages, namely, fruit juices and energy drinks containing nutritional supplements; Frozen carbonated beverages; Frozen fruit beverages; Frozen fruit-based beverages; Fruit beverages; Fruit-based beverages; Fruit-flavored beverages; Fruit-flavoured beverages; Iced fruit beverages; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; Non-alcoholic malt beverage; Non-carbonated, non-alcoholic frozen flavored beverages; Orange juice beverages; Pineapple juice beverages; Smoothies; Whey beverages | ACTIVE | Jun 28, 2001 |
| 043 | Fast-food restaurant services; Preparation of food and beverages; Restaurant and cafe services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | Jun 28, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |