Drawing for ORGASMIC

USPTO serial 86028195

ORGASMIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGASMIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ester Martín Maillaro

ESTER MARTÍN MAILLARO HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Batteries; power battery chargersABANDONED—
010Condoms; adult sexual stimulation aids, namely, massage apparatus, artificial penises, penis enlargers, benwa balls, artificial vaginas, synthetic reproductions of parts of the male and female anatomy, synthetic reproductions of penises and vaginas, penis rings, nipple clamps, vibrators, dildos, dongs, butt plugs, penis sleeves, penis extensions, harnesses, masturbators, body prostheses, love dolls, vaginal exercisers, enema apparatusABANDONED—
018Whips; leather strapsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2018MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2018ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 14, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 8, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 8, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 13, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2017DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 21, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 16, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 15, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 6, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 12, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance