USPTO serial 86034504
DEER BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEER BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Barley flour; Bean-jam filled wafers (monaka); Biscuits and bread; Bread; Bread and buns; Bread and pastry; Bread flavoured with spices; Buckwheat flour; Cardamom; Chocolate covered cookies; Cinnamon powder; Clove powder; Cooked rice; Cookies; Cookies and crackers; Corn flour; Steamed rice; Spices in the form of powders; Spices; Spice rubs; Spice blends; Samosas; Rice starch flour; Rice flour; Rice cakes; Rice; Puffed rice; Pepper spice; Pepper powder; Pepper; Mustard powder; Masala rice for biryani; Masala powder and spices; Instant spice blends; Ice cream mixes; Ice cream drinks; Ice cream desserts; Ice cream bars; Ice cream; Hot pepper powder; Ginger; Frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Flour for food; Flour; Flat bread; Enriched rice; Edible spices; Edible flour; Dry spice rub for meats and fish; Corn starch flour; Curry; Curry powder; Dried cooked-rice | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |