USPTO serial 86041598
DAZZLE-IT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAZZLE-IT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J. McAllister
TERRENCE J. MCALLISTER OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLE, LLP1 LANDMARK SQ FL 10STAMFORD, CT 06901-2619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric glue guns | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Jewelry making tools namely, jewelry pliers, hand-operated hot fix tool applicator; jewelry making tools namely, wire working wrapping tools for jewelry making; hand-operated tool to aid in tying and untying knots when attaching pearls; hand operated tools for attaching beads to boards, counting beads, spinning beads, and loading beads; jewelry making tools namely, a tool developed for easy braiding; hand tools, namely, wire crimpers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Calipers for measuring beads | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Beads for making jewelry; pendants; jewelry making kits comprised of stringing materials namely, wire, hemp, nylon, monofilament/fish line for jewelry making, craft wire for wire wrapping (aluminum), stretch cord, silk thread and elastic cord cotton, leather, suede and silk bead cord, clasps, finishers, terminators, jump rings, head pins, connectors, spacers, bails, filigrees, bead caps, crimps, crimp covers, cones, crimp ends, bead tips, end caps, earring components, native accessories, chain, head pins, eye pins, ball head pins, unfinished broaches, earrings parts, settings, split rings, bails, rhinestone components; jewelry making materials namely flat backs and cabochons made of glass, crystal, wood, metal, acrylic, plastic, resin, bone, handmade, shell, semi-precious, ceramic, pearls; nylon wax cord; sinew and artificial sinew; vinyl and plastic cord; metal craft wire for use in jewelry making, namely, wire wrapping in copper, silver, brass; organizers for jewelry accessories; bead lamp, namely, lamp used to assist in jewelry making | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Books in the field of jewelry making; packaging supplies namely, empty containers in the form of vials, jars, and paper and plastic bags for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Faux leather and suede; leathers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Display cases for jewelry and merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Decorative beaded trims, plastic trims, textile trims, sequin trims for costumes; jewelry making tools namely, beading needles, needles for working with leather; tassels; soutache cording | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by John Bead Corporation Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named DAZZLE-IT!
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |