USPTO serial 86052119
BRIIDGE.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5298927Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 2017
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRIIDGE.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Cadwell
JEFFREY R. CADWELL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLPSUITE 150050 SOUTH SIXTH STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(e)) Security software, namely, software that enables authentication of computing devices or a user of the devices, to allow the user to access online services or to execute online transactions; security software, namely, software that securely reads and transmits identity of payment credential information presented by a user; computer hardware, namely, hardware security tokens and payment or identity credential readers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) Computer network security services, namely, authenticating the identity credentials, payment credentials, and identity attributes, and the mobile phone, handheld computer, tablet computer, laptop computer, or desktop computer of a remote user; secure transmission of identity credentials, payment credentials, and identity attributes; online login confirmation services, namely, enabling a user making a login request to an online service provider to confirm their login request using a second device in the nature of a mobile phone, handheld computer, tablet computer, laptop computer, or desktop computer; online transaction confirmation services, namely, enabling a user executing a transaction with an online service provider to view the transaction details and approve the transaction using a second device in the nature of a mobile phone, handheld computer, tablet computer, laptop computer, or desktop computer; providing online non-downloadable security software, namely, software that enables authentication of computing devices or a user of the devices, to allow the user to access online services or to execute online transactions; providing online non-downloadable security software, namely, software that securely reads and transmits identity of payment credential information presented by a user | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 26, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SecureKey Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SecureKey Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SecureKey Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BRIIDGE.NET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |