CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for YUNI

USPTO serial 86063466

YUNI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YUNI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Mizrahi

MARK B. MIZRAHI WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP11400 W OLYMPIC BLVD FL 9LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1582UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003LIP BALM, SOAPS FOR PERSONAL USE, MASSAGE OIL, EYE CREAM, FACIAL MAKEUP, NAMELY, FACE PRIMER; PERSONAL DEODORANT; ROOM FRAGRANCES; AROMATIC FACIAL; HYDRATING FACIAL AND BODY SPRAYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 12, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2017FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2017FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 2, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 31, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 27, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 30, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 24, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
May 23, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 31, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 3, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 14, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 31, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance