Drawing for BLUBOOST

USPTO serial 86064681

BLUBOOST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUBOOST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritionally fortified beveragesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 15, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 15, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 15, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 27, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 16, 2015RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Mar 16, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 20, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 20, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 20, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 22, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 27, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 26, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Sep 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 17, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance