USPTO serial 86065240
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary food supplements, namely, chocolate-based meal replacement bars for weight loss and sports nutrition | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | Processed fruit and nut based food bars; organic nut and seed based snack bars | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Cereal bars; candy bars; grain based snack food, namely, grain based snack bars | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing services for others for nutritional and candy bar food items, namely, meal replacement, cereal, fruit and nut, diet, organic, and candy bars | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 26, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 26, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |