Drawing for APPPROTEX

USPTO serial 86066035

APPPROTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with APPPROTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol Anne Been

CAROL ANNE BEEN DENTONS US LLPPO BOX 61080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for data protection and data encryption in enterprise and cloud computing environments; computer software development toolsACTIVE
035Business consulting services in the field of data protection and data encryption for enterprise and cloud computing environmentsACTIVE
042Data protection and data encryption services for enterprise and cloud computing environments; Software as a Service (SAAS) and Platform as a Service (PAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in data protection and data encryptionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 17, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Sep 17, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 9, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 9, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
May 13, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 17, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 5, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 21, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 21, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Sep 4, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 18, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 8, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 8, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 25, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance