USPTO serial 86067538
PROVIDENCE. INTELLIGENCE THROUGH FORESIGHT.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROVIDENCE. INTELLIGENCE THROUGH FORESIGHT.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for transmission of communication; Computer hardware for use in detection, tracing, locating, analysis, interception and/or recording of communications; apparatus and equipment relating to the security, detection, surveillance and/or monitoring of personnel, vehicles and premises, namely, electric and electronic video surveillance installations; vehicle locating, trading and security system comprising of an antenna and radio transmitter to be place in a vehicle; counter-surveillance apparatus and equipment, namely, electronic transmitters for jamming signals; Electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points; Wireless transmitters and receivers | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2012 |
| 013 | Ammunition; Ammunition for firearms; Explosives; Firearms; Fireworks; Projectiles | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2012 |
| 041 | Training services in the field of security and surveillance, namely, training in the use and operation of equipment for use in security, detection, surveillance and/or monitoring of personnel, vehicles, and premises; training of personnel in the use of communications apparatus and systems; training of personnel in the use and operation of equipment use for counter-surveillance | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2012 |
| 045 | Electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the field of surveillance, monitoring of security systems, and providing audio and video monitoring of premises for security purposes relating to security, detection, surveillance and monitoring of personnel, vehicles and premises; security services relating to counter-surveillance, namely, providing reconnaissance and surveillance services; advisory and consultancy services relating to the forgoing for government, defense and law enforcement agencies, namely, security consultancy; Surveillance services | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Providence SA Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PROVIDENCE. INTELLIGENCE THROUGH FORESIGHT.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2015 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 14, 2015 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |