Drawing for INFUSION

USPTO serial 86068923

INFUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victor J. Wasylyna

VICTOR J. WASYLYNA WALTERS & WASYLYNA LLC8193 AVERY RD STE 101CLEVELAND, OH 44147-1673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010therapeutic pillowsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 28, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 24, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 23, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 17, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 17, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 25, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 30, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 30, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 23, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance