USPTO serial 86070431
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric O. Haugen
ERIC O. HAUGEN HAUGEN LAW FIRM PLLP121 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2841UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair lotions; non-medicated preparations for the care of hair and scalp; depilatory products, namely, creams, waxes, preparations and lotions; shampoos; conditioning substances for use on hair; heat protection sprays, lotions, gels and creams for the hair; sun protection sprays, lotions, gels and creams for the hair; hair coloring products, namely, colorants, and masks; hair coloring agents and dyes for use in hair; hair waving preparations; cleansing preparations for use on hair; hair styling gels, creams, mousses and lotions; hair spray; finishing polish for hair; oil for hair; hair masks, including hydrating and super-glossing hair masks; hair pomades; skin care products, namely, moisturizers, toners, cleansing preparations, lotions, oils and creams; bar soap; bath soaps; facial cleansers; skin creams; skin lotions; skin emollients; moisturizing body oils and lotions; shaving soaps, creams, and lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand tools and hand-operated implements for cutting, namely, scissors; razors; electric and non-electric devices and instruments for the cutting, trimming and removal of hair, namely, shavers, razors and depilatory devices; razor blades; razor strops, razor cases; shaver cases; hair trimmers; hair clippers; beard clippers; hair removing tweezers; hair waving tongs; electric and non-electric hand instruments for hair curling; hair crimping irons; hair styling tongs; hair curling apparatuses and instruments, namely, electrical hair curling irons, wands, and tongs | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Hair dryers | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Ribbons and braids; hair ornaments; hair bands; bows for the hair; hair coloring caps; hair coloring products, namely, hair coloring foils; electric hair curlers other than hand implements; non-electric hair curlers other than hand implements; hair curling pins; false hair; hair pieces; hair extensions, namely, plaited hair; hair pins; hair grips and slides | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring hair care products, beauty products, non-medicated skin preparation products, cosmetic products, and personal care products | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |