USPTO serial 86071761
EVERCRETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVERCRETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
George Town, KY
George Town, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
ROBERT W ZELNICK MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 N CAPITOL ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-1531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for protecting or sealing concrete; concrete preservative, namely, a liquid which penetrates through the surface of concrete, cement, granite and brick to make it dustproof, waterproof, crumble proof and wear proof; chemical products for use in the manufacture, preparation and treatment of concrete; chemical compositions for hardening, weatherproofing and waterproofing concrete; preservatives for tiles, masonry, cement, wood or brickwork; chemical compositions and gels for sealing, waterproofing, hardening and preserving concrete | ABANDONED | — |
| 002 | Oils for use as protective coatings for concrete; oils for use as concrete preservatives; oils for use as protective coatings for wood; oils for use as wood preservatives; sealer coatings for use in sealing cement surfaces; sealer coatings for use in sealing wood surfaces; wood preservative | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |