Drawing for PREMIST

USPTO serial 86071912

PREMIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREMIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus Peterson

CAROLYN S TOTO PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP725 S FIGUEROA STREET SUITE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ToiletsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 24, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 24, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 13, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 13, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 13, 2017CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Mar 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 20, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 20, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 22, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 22, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2016CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 2, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 5, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 27, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 27, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 15, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 15, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 15, 2015EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 17, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 15, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 15, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 3, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 1, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Sep 30, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance