USPTO serial 86071927
AMC DRILLING FLUIDS & PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMC DRILLING FLUIDS & PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan Rochman, Esq.
Joan Rochman, Esq. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP11355 W. Olympic Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for use in drilling processes, namely lubricating greases, lubricating oils, polymers, bio-polymers, mix-metal oxides, bentonite, cellulose and organic materials; chemical fluids for drilling; chemical additives for oil well drilling fluids | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Fuels and illuminants, namely Lubricating Greases, Biocides and Scavengers, Oxidizing, acid and Corrosive Breakers, Salt and Amine Shale and Clay Stabilizers, Defoamers, Dispersant and Thinners, Emulsifiers and Demulsifies, Polymeric Flocculants, Synthetic and Natural Polymers, Cellulose, Mineral and Organic Fibre Materials, Foaming agents, Surfactants and Detergents, Lubricants and Cutting Oils, Organic and Inorganic Salts, Bentonite Clay; drilling fluids, namely lubricating greases; lubricating oils for use as drilling fluids; non-chemical additives for drilling fluids; non-chemical additives for oils and lubricants used in drilling processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines and machine tools; machine couplings and transmission components | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AMC DRILLING FLUIDS & PRODUCTS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |