USPTO serial 86072445
SNACKS GONE SIMPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNACKS GONE SIMPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margarita Wallach
Margarita Wallach McCarter & English, LLP245 Park Avenue, 27th FloorNew York, NY 10167UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Baked vegetables, namely, baked vegetable snack chips; roasted nuts; Nut-based snack foods; Bean-based snack foods; seed-based snack foods; Potato chips, sweet potato chips; snacks, namely, vegetable chips and snack foods made from potatoes, yucca, and sweet potato; chopped vegetables; crushed fruit; snacks, namely, potato flour based snack foods and potato starch based snack foods, namely, potato crisps; Nuts, namely, processed nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal-based snack foods; Snacks, namely, grain-based, nutrient-dense ready-to-eat food bars, also containing dried fruits, chocolate, nuts, seeds, and soy; Energy bars comprised primarily of brown rice syrup; ready-to-eat grain based food bars; grain based snack foods; granola bars; Yogurt-based snack foods, namely, yogurt covered nuts and fruit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bare Fruit, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Bare Fruit, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BARE FOODS CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SNACKS GONE SIMPLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |