Drawing for APPROPOSOFTWARE

USPTO serial 86072483

APPROPOSOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APPROPOSOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura Drossman

LAURA DROSSMAN DROSSMAN LAW, PC2261 Market Street #454SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Children's educational software; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for voice-activated educational app for children; Computer application software for children, namely, software for voice-activated educational gaming; Computer game software; Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Educational software featuring instruction in speech therapy; Electronic game software; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Electronic game software for wireless devices; Game software; Interactive game software; Video game softwareACTIVEAug 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 13, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 12, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 16, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 12, 2014EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 10, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 1, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 2, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance