USPTO serial 86072512
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MONTRÉAL (QC), CA
Montréal (QC), CA
TECHNOLOGIES ORCKESTRA INC. / ORCKESTRA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
LONGUEUIL (QUEBEC), CA
Other trademarks owned by TECHNOLOGIES ORCKESTRA INC. / ORCKESTRA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MONTRÉAL (QC), CA
MONTRÉAL (QC), CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
Stacey R. Halpern KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | E-commerce software to facilitate e-commerce activities allowing organizations to manage products, orders, customers, marketing and any other e-commerce related activities between business multi-touchpoints, consumer multi-touchpoints and social media multi- touchpoints; software for developing, managing and operating cloud-based e-commerce solutions in software as a service (SaaS), platform as a services (PaaS) and/or infrastructure as a service (IaaS) environments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 5, 2010 |
| 042 | Planning, design and management of Information technology services and consulting services in the field of development, design, implementation, management, support and maintenance of omni-channel e-commerce solutions using on-premise, on demand or hybrid deployment models; information technology consulting services in the field of cloud-based e-commerce solutions to allow others to deploy, manage, monitor and perform electronic business transactions via a cloud based e-commerce software as a service (SaaS), platform as a service (PaaS) and/or infrastructure as a service (IaaS) environments; software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in electronic business transactions; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for cloud-based e-commerce solutions to allow others to deploy, manage, monitor and perform electronic business transactions; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms to use in electronic business transactions; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for cloud-based e-commerce solutions to allow others to deploy, manage, monitor and perform electronic business transactions; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring e commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; infrastructure as a service (IaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in electronic business transactions; infrastructure as a service (IaaS) featuring computer software platforms for cloud-based e-commerce solutions to allow others to deploy, manage, monitor and perform electronic business transactions; infrastructure as a service (IaaS) featuring e commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; consulting in the field of information technology; computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SaaS); consulting services in the field of cloud computing; consulting services in the field of providing online, non-downloadable software and applications; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 5, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 5, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |