USPTO serial 86072517
COMMERCE ORCHESTRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2017
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with COMMERCE ORCHESTRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal (QC), CA
MONTRÉAL (QC), CA
TECHNOLOGIES ORCKESTRA INC. / ORCKESTRA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
LONGUEUIL (QUEBEC), CA
Other trademarks owned by TECHNOLOGIES ORCKESTRA INC. / ORCKESTRA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MONTRÉAL (QC), CA
MONTRÉAL (QC), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andy I. Corea
Andy I. Corea MURTHA CULLINA LLP265 Church StreetOne Century TowerNew Haven, CT 06510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | E-commerce software to facilitate e-commerce activities to allow organizations to manage products, orders, customers, marketing and any other e-commerce related activities between business multi-touchpoints, consumer multi-touchpoints and social media multi- touchpoints; software for developing, managing and operating cloud-based e-commerce solutions in software as a service (SaaS), Platform as a services (Paas) and/or infrastructure as a service (IaaS) environments; computer software applications for use in the field of serving and managing product information for any designated touchpoint; software to access structured product data and unstructured data; software for integration and shared use of information from different software applications, platforms, operating systems or databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Planning, design and management of Information technology services and consulting services in the field of development, design, implementation, management, support and maintenance of omni-channel e-commerce solutions using on-premise, on demand or hybrid deployment models; information technology consulting services in the field of cloud-based e-commerce solutions to allow others to deploy, manage, monitor and perform electronic business transactions via a cloud based e-commerce software as a service (SaaS), platform as a service (PaaS) and/or infrastructure as a service (IaaS) environments; software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in electronic business transactions; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for cloud-based e-commerce solutions to allow others to deploy, manage, monitor and perform electronic business transactions; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms to use in electronic business transactions; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for cloud-based e-commerce solutions to allow others to deploy, manage, monitor and perform electronic business transactions; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring e commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; infrastructure as a service (IaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in electronic business transactions; infrastructure as a service (IaaS) featuring computer software platforms for cloud-based e-commerce solutions to allow others to deploy, manage, monitor and perform electronic business transactions; infrastructure as a service (IaaS) featuring e commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; consulting in the field of information technology; computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SaaS); consulting services in the field of cloud computing; consulting services in the field of providing online, non-downloadable software and applications; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Orckestra Conseil Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ORCKESTRA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOLOGIES ORCKESTRA INC. / ORCKESTRA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORCKESTRA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORCKESTRA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COMMERCE ORCHESTRATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 20, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |