USPTO serial 86074011
RICH PURE LUXURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RICH PURE LUXURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jan Tamulewicz
Jan Tamulewicz Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP575 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10022-2585Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; moisturizers for hair, face, body and hands; creams for hair, face, body and hands; non-medicated skin care preparations; cosmetic sunscreen preparations; non-medicated toiletries; nail care preparations; hair care preparations; shampoos; hair lotions; hair gels; hair sprays; non-medicated hair shine serums; hair conditioners; hair foams; hair oils; hair moisturizers; hair bleaching preparations; hair colorants; hair decolorants; hair dyes; hair colouring and hair decolorant preparations; hair balsams; hair glazes; hair lacquers; hair waving and hair setting preparations; hair curling preparations; cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; hair cleaning preparations; hair straightening preparations; hair styling preparations; hair rinses; hair tonics; non-medicated hair treatment preparations; hair masks; hair mousses; hair relaxing preparations; hair removing cream; adhesives for affixing false hair; hair fixers | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Electric hair straighteners; electric hair curling irons; electric hair straightening irons; electric irons for styling hair; electric hand-held hair styling irons; electric and battery-powered hair clippers; electric and battery-powered hair trimmers; electric hair cutters; bags and cases specifically adapted for holding or carrying the aforementioned goods in class 8 | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric hair dryers; hair dryers; hair drying machines for beauty salon use; hair steamers for beauty salon use; hand-held electric hair dryers; stationary hair dryers for commercial or domestic use; bags and cases specifically adapted for holding or carrying hand-held electric hair dryers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |